In May 2018, the York Health Economics Consortium published new findings that showed that scrapping prescription charges for just two long-term conditions (IBD and Parkinson’s) would save the NHS over £20 million a year.
Savings came from:

• 9% fewer A&E visits for people with Parkinson’s
• 11.4% less hospital admissions for people with Parkinson’s
• 7,149 less flares for IBD
• 3,887 fewer GP visits for people with Crohn’s Disease

These findings show us what we already suspected, scrapping prescription charges would in fact save NHS England money. At a time when budgets are tight, the Government should listen to evidence that shows the economic benefits of ending prescription charges for long-term conditions.

I was born in 1968 and so was the medical exemption list. This list decides who pays prescription charges and who doesn’t, but I didn’t have a say in getting Parkinson’s.

I was diagnosed with Parkinson’s aged 9, though I’ve had the symptoms since I was 7. Fortunately for me I had a working tax credit exemption until recently, which meant I didn’t have to pay for the more than 200,000 tablets I’ve taken in my lifetime.

Since losing that exemption I’ve had to ration my medication to spread the cost, prioritising the most urgent ones and leaving others for later. I now pay monthly through the prepayment scheme. It’s stressful because I can’t live without my drugs. I’ve been on levodopa for so long that my body couldn’t cope without it.

I’ve had to start counting the pennies more and more. I resent paying it as it could still cost me thousands throughout my life and there is nothing I can do about it! I’ve worked for as long as possible and paid my national insurance contributions, so it’s galling to think that I’m being treated differently to other people whose long-term conditions are exempt.

Last summer I shared my story as part of the Prescription Charges Coalition launch of their report Still Paying the Price which found that among those like myself currently paying for prescriptions, a third had not collected medications due to the cost. Others reported skipping or reducing their doses to save money – leading to worsening health, time off work and emergency hospital admissions.

New research published just last week by the York Health Economics Consortium now shows that for people with Parkinson’s (and inflammatory bowel disease), charging for prescriptions is a false economy to the NHS. By removing prescription charges, people like me are better able to stay well and avoid health complications- which would mean fewer GP visits and emergency hospital admissions. For each working age person with Parkinson’s the NHS would save £93 per year by scrapping prescription charges.

Next week the medical exemption list will be 50 years old- but I won’t be celebrating. It is time to change this unfair and outdated system. Add your voice by signing up to the Thunderclap.

​Matt Eagles @MattEagles

Everyone involved with this campaign has known for a long time that the additional costs to the NHS, resulting from people with long term conditions not taking their medication due to its cost, were likely to outweigh the money raised by charging them for the prescription they need. 
Thousands of people effectively told us so in our first Paying the Price survey back in 2013 and then again last year in the follow up report Still Paying The Price. 

Nevertheless, it was still amazing to see the scale of that potential saving to the NHS when the York Health Economics Consortium first shared the findings of their economic modelling with us.  Over £20 million per year in NHS savings for just two conditions of the 46 now covered by the Prescription Charges Coalition.  This gives us for the first time, a robust economic case for scrapping prescription charges for all long-term conditions.
​
It was fantastic to be able to share this with MPs in Parliament this week (Weds 23rd May).  Thanks to the invaluable support from the many people who wrote to their MPs to attend this briefing session, 41 MPs and 3 researchers attended, many of whom were very interested and willing to give their support to the campaign to end unfair prescription charges for people with long-term conditions.  Other MPs wrote to express their support and willingness to write to the Minister to call for reform.

We now need to build on this. 
On 5th June, we are handing the petition into Downing Street – please help make this the strongest it can be by signing if you have not already done so and forwarding on to family, friends, work colleagues and anyone you think might be interested. 
​
Thank you for all your support and please continue to help us to make prescription charges an issue that can no longer be swept under the carpet.
​
Jackie Glatter, Health Service Development Manager, Crohn's& Colitis UK

Right now, in the UK, there are about 60,000 people with kidney failure, with just over half alive due a kidney transplant and the remainder on dialysis.

Transplant is the gold standard treatment for kidney failure, but not everyone is able to have one and sadly there are more people needing a kidney transplant than there are kidneys available via the organ donor register. Every single day, one person will die while waiting for that precious call.
 For those 29,000 people on dialysis, they need either to go to hospital three times a week for 3-4 hours at a time for their life-sustaining treatment or they can do this at home. Either way, dialysis is a very challenging treatment. People on dialysis often have other conditions to manage, such as diabetes, and many people will feel unwell during and just after dialysis itself, as blood pressure can be too high or too low, and nausea, fainting and confusion are common.

Currently, some dialysis patients will qualify for free prescriptions, but this – rather complicated – exemption is based on the fact that any dialysis patient who has a permanent fistula (which is access for dialysis needles) that ‘requires an appliance or surgical dressing’ is entitled to medical exemption. They also need a doctor to confirm this and the NHS guidance on this even states that ‘whether or not you have a permanent fistula that requires an appliance or surgical dressing is a matter for your doctor's clinical judgement’. This means that in some cases a doctor will approve patients for exemption, but in some cases, they may not – based on their own interpretation of the rules. We have heard from a number of dialysis patients who were able to get exemptions and others who were not, so we know that there is a postcode lottery out there with some patients slipping through the net.
 
If that isn’t bad enough, the injustice really kicks in for those people who do receive that life-transforming transplant. To ensure that your body doesn’t reject your new kidney or kidneys, transplant recipients have to take immunosuppressant medication for the rest of their lives. They also need to take many other medicines to manage blood pressure, diabetes and the other conditions a person with kidney failure will have. Despite this, because they are now no longer on dialysis, they no longer qualify for free prescriptions. At the time when a person possibly needs it the most, this support is taken away.

Many patients go on to purchase a Pre-Payment Certificate, but they tell us how unfair it is and how they feel discriminated against, or that they were not aware their exemption was removed and have had to pay a fine. This group are also affected by the recent reports that the NHS will no longer provide sunscreen on prescription, as their immunosuppressants give a risk of skin cancer which is six times higher than the rest of the population.

It is not fair that anyone with a long term health condition should have to pay for their prescriptions and we think the current system is particularly unfair for kidney patients, who need to take medication for the rest of their lives, just to stay alive. We’re calling on the Government to review and reform this unjust and outdated system to make prescriptions free for everyone living with a long-term condition in England, as they are in other parts of the United Kingdom.
here to edit.
​
Fiona Loud, Policy Director at Kidney Care UK

“There have been a few times where I have had to skip my inhaler because I have not been able to afford it. I can't understand why my brother gets his diabetes medication for free but I have to pay for mine despite being hospitalised numerous times because of my asthma?” Asthma UK Facebook post

There is nothing as frightening as not being able to breathe, yet this is the reality for someone in the UK every eight minutes as they are admitted to hospital for an asthma attack.

Asthma affects 1 in 11 people in the UK and tragically kills around 1,200 every year – that’s three people every day. Those living with this long-term condition often need to take several medicines every day to stay well. Asthma often affects people over their whole lifetime – from childhood to old age.

Despite being a complex condition, we know that when people are supported to self-manage their asthma there is significant improvement in their medicine adherence, asthma control and quality of life. Better self-management may result in fewer GP appointments, thus also reducing the 70,000 asthma emergency admissions every year in the UK and saving the NHS money.

While we know the NHS faces difficult times, it is unacceptable that 35% of people with asthma receive only the very basic elements of asthma management. Paying for medicines is a real issue, with 64% of people with asthma saying that the charges impact their finances. 

The costs associated with asthma are increasing globally. The UK alone spends in excess of £1 billion in direct healthcare expenditure on the condition. 85% of asthma patients are managed exclusively in primary care, with asthma estimated to account for around 2–3% of GP consultations. Asthma is also estimated to cost around £52m in GP consultations. This comes at a time when GPs are under significant pressure, thus affecting patients and impacting on the wider NHS.

Over the years, prescription charges have risen at levels higher than inflation and now represent a significant expense for people with asthma.

This year sees the 50th anniversary of the list of conditions exempt from paying for prescriptions.
Many conditions that people now live with for years either did not exist when the exemption criteria was created, or had such a short life expectancy that it was thought unnecessary to include them. Despite great medical advances in healthcare, the NHS’s medical exemption criteria for prescription charges has barely changed since its introduction. This level of progress is unacceptable and it’s time for a change.

In our recent annual asthma survey, nearly two thirds  of people with asthma told us that the cost of paying for their prescription had an impact on them. For some this means the cost of prescriptions prevents them from taking their medicines, forces them to take them in lower doses than prescribed or makes them choose between emergency inhalers and those that prevent future symptoms and attacks. These sacrifices put people with asthma at greater risk of a potentially life-threatening asthma attack. 

A flexible and fairer approach to prescription charges for people with asthma will benefit those who have been stung by rises in prescription charges in recent years and are struggling to pay for vital medication.

Join the campaign today by signing this petition to call on the Government to urgently reform the prescription charge exemption criteria in England.

Derry Begho, External Affairs and Stakeholder Officer, Asthma UK

Spina bifida is a complex condition involving most of the body- pain, high blood pressure, infections to the skin and tissues, pressure sores and thin bones are commonplace. Until relatively recent times, open spina bifida led to death in the infants or children born with it, in the vast majority of cases.

From the 1960s, a breakthrough in treatment meant lives could be saved, and many of the 4000 babies born with spina bifida each year at that time survived. However, by the mid-1960s, it was apparent that renal failure, arising from abnormal bladder function, was a severe, often fatal complication. It became a routine part of early treatment to surgically bypass the bladder, diverting the urine into a permanent stoma on the abdomen.

When the medical exemption list was published in 1968, the list of people exempt from prescription charges included those using collection devices for people with permanent stomas, so the vast majority of people with spina bifida received all their prescriptions, (including those for unrelated conditions) without charge.

Advances in medical technology meant that from the late 1970s, fewer people used a permanent stoma.  New techniques using a temporary thin catheter coupled with medication to relax the bladder allowed many people with spina bifida to achieve continence. Most children from the 1980s grew up with this method, and some adults had their stoma reversed to improve their body image.

However, despite gaining all the benefits of better health and improved quality of life, intermittent catheterisation meant people with spina bifida lost exemption from prescription charges. Unless working adults met the criteria in some other way, such as epilepsy, they needed to pay for prescriptions for catheters and bladder relaxant medications.

More recently, advances in bowel management, such as irrigation, have further liberated adults with spina bifida from ill health and incontinence, allowing some to have the confidence to take paid work for the first time in their lives. The equipment is available on prescription, and yes, they have to pay!

To live comfortably, people with spina bifida tell Shine they often have between 5 and 11 prescription items every month. Even with the ill-publicised Prepayment Certificate, living and working with a long-term condition gets expensive. For those entering the world of work, prescription charges add to the financial burden that people with long-term conditions like spina bifida bear.

It’s high time this unfairness was ended. In June this year the medical exemption list will be 50 years old. Please sign the Petition calling on the Government to urgently review this situation so that people with long-term conditions don’t have to struggle with the cost of prescriptions. Medical technology has advanced- but this list is stuck in the past!

Gillian Yaz
​Health Development Manager at Shine

Imagine being told by your GP that after months of ill-health all the tests confirm that you have a life-long condition. You may have to change your life to cope with your symptoms and have regular medical appointments. And what about work – how will they take it if you need to drop a shift at short notice because you’re unwell? Medication will help but as you are in work, not on benefits and live in England, you’ll need to pay £8.80 for every item on your prescription. How’s that going to affect the family finances?

As a community pharmacist I often hear exactly these kinds of concerns from people who come in clutching a prescription and needing advice. They’re not alone – around 15 million people in England have a long-term condition.

Some long-term conditions attract the prescription charge, but others don’t, which is deeply unfair.  This situation has arisen because the list of those exempt from prescription charges was set up 50 years ago and hasn’t changed since. It was established at a time when people with certain illnesses weren’t expected to live that long and other conditions hadn’t even been discovered yet, for example genetic disorders, some autoimmune diseases and HIV.

Large scale surveys of patients consistently show that 1 in 3 people who work and have a long-term condition struggle to afford their medicines. Some have to ration the medicines they take.  People frequently say to me about their prescription “I can’t afford all of these – which one can I do without?” Others have to choose between paying for their medicines or household bills. They face medicines poverty because they have an illness they don’t want.

The same surveys show that around 1 in 5 people with a long-term condition don’t buy a pre-payment certificate,  a kind of season ticket for people needing regular medication, because they feel they don’t get enough prescriptions to benefit from one. This is particularly true if your condition fluctuates and some months you need a lot of medicines and then others you don’t.  Buying a pre-payment certificate is also beyond the means of many at £104 per year.  If you are on a zero hours contract with a variable monthly income, paying regular instalments for medicines you may or may not need that month becomes a luxury you can’t afford.

Prescription charges act as a tax on the sick that impacts on people’s health. If you can’t afford to take the medicines you need regularly and you become really unwell, the Government ends up paying for the knock-on expense of hospital admissions and at around £400 a day for a hospital bed that’s a significant cost. This isn’t a party political issue. The problem has existed for decades. 

The Prescription Charges Coalition is an organisation made up of 40 charities campaigning to abolish unfair prescription charges for people with long term conditions. It is calling on all political parties to abolish the unfair list of selective medical exemptions drawn up in 1968 and ease the financial burden on those least able to pay, improving health and reducing costs in the long-term too. Join the campaign today by signing the e-petition  today and help end medicines poverty for those with life-long conditions who can’t afford to pay for their medicines.
​
​Sandra Gidley, Royal Pharmaceutical Society

The reason for Poppy’s morning struggle? Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a form of inflammatory arthritis which most commonly affects the spine. It can also affect other joints, eyes, bowels, skin, lungs and heart. At best, AS can be managed with anti-inflammatory drugs and exercise, but at its worst, a combination of strong medications is necessary.

Poppy was diagnosed with the condition three years ago, after showing symptoms from the age of 13.
​
Poppy gets on with life as best she can, studying at Manchester Metropolitan University and working part-time to support herself through uni. She is supported by her partner Ben, who Poppy describes as “amazing”. Her university is understanding, but teachers and peers will never know just how painful life can be with AS – even something as simple as sitting in the wrong type of chair can cause incredible pain and discomfort. Despite this, Poppy maintains a positive, proactive attitude.

She has, however, seen some dark times due to AS. Over the years she has been prescribed a huge number of different drugs to help her with her daily pain and fatigue. Poppy also is also hypermobile, meaning her joints painfully move beyond the normal range, and lives with fibromyalgia, a long-term condition that causes pain all over her body. As such, it took a long time for her consultant to be able to find the right combination of drugs. At one point, Poppy was on seven different drugs to combat her condition.

The monthly cost of these prescriptions was £61.60 – an unaffordable sum for a student working part time. This meant that she often skipped her medication for two to three weeks at a time, forcing her to miss lectures due to pain and her inability to move.

Without medication, so many people with ankylosing spondylitis like Poppy don’t have the quality of life that people who don’t live with a long-term condition do. Please support those who need it by signing the petition, which calls for the medical exemption list to be revised and include free prescriptions for all those living with a long-term condition.

For more information on ankylosing spondylitis (axial spondyloarthritis) visit www.nass.co.uk. ​

The world has changed remarkably in the last 50 years, especially in terms of medical and technological advances. In many ways, this is extremely positive for people with Crohn’s Disease, Ulcerative Colitis and other long-term conditions.  Greater understanding, more drugs and new surgical techniques have transformed the options and outcomes for people who are living with Crohn’s and Colitis compared to 1968, when the prescription charge exemption criteria were created.
​
However, there is still no cure available and, in fact, the more we find out, the more complex these conditions turn out to be. What is particularly difficult is that people with similar symptoms often respond differently to the same treatment, which means it can take months or years of pain and frustration to arrive at a treatment that works and, even then, this may fail over time.  

We have been told by the Government that the records no longer exist which would explain why certain conditions were included or excluded from the prescription charge exemption list. What we do know is that, because the list hasn’t been comprehensively updated for 50 years, it is completely out of step with changes in the management of Crohn’s and Colitis and many other conditions besides.

In one of the peculiar quirks of the system, those who have a permanent stoma (an opening on the wall of the abdomen that diverts the contents of the bowel out of the body) are eligible for free prescriptions, while those with Crohn’s or Colitis who require continuous medication to manage their condition are not. All clearly face a significant additional cost burden throughout their lives and it is crucial that this is recognised.

This arbitrary distinction makes no sense today and is leading people to self-ration medication they need to keep them well. As a result, flare-ups can occur and can result in people needing stronger and more expensive treatment, potentially leading to surgery and an increased risk of colorectal cancer. This affects their ability to work and can have a devastating impact on family, social life and an individual’s self-esteem.

The current language of the NHS is focused on ‘value’, ‘medicine optimisation’ and ‘self-management’, yet this archaic and inequitable system of charges and exemptions is entirely counterproductive to these aims and it is high time that it was overhauled by the Government.

It’s time for change.  It’s time to end prescription charges for people with long-term conditions.